Monday, July 06, 2009
May 17: As I tried to pack for my cross-country move, I categorized my stuff left over from umpteen years of education. If only I'd figured that out earlier!
May 23: You may have already read my musings on the significance of graduation - the day that is.
June 2: While teaching some second year students during their transition to the wards, I learned that an expert medical student is only a mediocre intern and a horrible attending.
June 14: I jotted down dome of my thoughts and emotions on the eve of my first responsibilities of internship.
June 27: It took a little while until I actually had my first shift. But soon after, I wrote just a bit about that.
July 4: I think hand washing is one of the easiest ways to reduce complications in medicine. Yet it remains the hardest for us health workers to actually do...
I've a few more entries in me until I put blogging on hold in favor of learning to be a doctor. But at least this will give you something to chew on. And maybe you'll see me back at Medscape in another capacity someday!
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Dear (Insert CT lawmaker name here),
I am a resident physician in the Yale-New Haven Hospital emergency department. I'm writing to tell you a little bit about ER conditions so that you will have a sense of how emergency care is an important issue that should be included in the currently debated health plan. A health care plan in our country cannot be comprehensive if it does not address emergency care.
When I show up for my 12 hour shift at Yale's level one trauma center, I am immediately inundated with an atmosphere that to an outsider could be perceived as chaos. The scene is far from the clean depictions on your television set, and believe me, there is not time for the intrigue that home viewers expect from “Grey's Anatomy.” Every night at many of the top hospitals in this country, patients sit in emergency room hallways for lack of private rooms. It is not unusual for these folks to receive all of their care in the hallway. I will personally wheel patients in and out of rooms so that they may have the dignity of a private exam. It breaks my heart to tell these folks, “We'll only be in here for 10 minutes before I take you back out into the hallway.” Can you imagine your doctor saying, “You have appendicitis and will need surgery, but until then try to make yourself comfortable on this hallway stretcher,” like I have? When you are having the worst pain of your life, you can't understand there is someone sicker than you.
This brings me to the health plan. There are always really sick patients. President Obama has been championing primary care as the centerpiece of his plan; and rightly so: prevention and a steady relationship with one doctor will go far to reduce health care costs. But increasing resources to primary care will not alleviate the overcrowding problems we face in delivering emergency care. For example, with 97% of the population in nearby Massachusetts insured, ER use has increased by nearly 10%. A refrain we physicians wish to emphasize is: coverage does not equal access. Where do people go when they get sick after hours?
I am familiar with and applaud sections 214 and 215 of the current Senate bill (“Systems for Emergency Care...” and “Trauma Centers...” in “Quality, Affordable Health Care for all Americans” submitted by Sen. Reid), and hope you will support these provisions. The grants and mandates are based on recommendations a 2006 Institute of Medicine report and will go far to improve care through one of the most frequent access points for people in need. In the interim, I'll do my part to see as many patients as I can safely handle so that our ER's hallways are used for walking, not patient care.
Thomas Robey, M.D., Ph.D.
If you are wondering why I don't post more here in the next year, it's because I'll be using my time to write other things. Such as letters like this...
My posting frequency will be much less this year. I'm afraid I just won't have the time to polish my writing in a way I'd be comfortable presenting to the blogosphere. But I am still writing. And I'll be back. There's still plenty of 'Hope' around. Hopefully I won't lose it through internship!
Monday, June 01, 2009
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Today's looking like another beautiful day.
The black bear that seen earlier this week in Seattle was found yesterday in Everett, WA, just 30 miles north of where is was first sited. The bear turned up in another urban area, so wildlife officials tranquilized him and transported him out of the urban area. Hopefully for him, the adolescent male was dropped off along Highway 2 in an area that is not already claimed by an older, stronger bear. In the end, I'm happy the animal did not meet the same demise that the poor creature found in the University District three years ago.
According to wildlife officials, at no point were humans at risk from the bear; they claim that the bear was more at risk from cars or from dumpster diving. Evidently, human food doesn't do much good for bears. It probably doesn't do best for humans either!
Friday, May 22, 2009
Anyway, I am so happy to be finished with one more task that I could yip with joy. Fortunately, I can save myself the embarrassment because the neighborhood coyotes are at this moment doing just that. Well, at least they are yipping for some reason.
If you would like to read more of my reflections, consider following this link to my column at The Differential.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
I hope this bear is not destroyed. I wonder how much cash has been spent on the bear thus far. Multiple squad car chases and a helicopter have been involved... Read the article. You're not going to believe it.
The bear, now named "Urban Phantom" has made his way back north and east of the city. Hopefully, we will find a spot more to his liking in the Cascades. Here's a map detailing many of the animal's sightings.
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Need a hint? My wife is an awesome packer. I am not.
Saturday, May 16, 2009
So what will I do with my time? I'll try gardening, home improvement, internet ideas and reading... These things I already do and actually enjoy more than commercial programming. For example, I liked this piece in the New York Times by its editorial observer Verlyn Klinkenborg about reading aloud. Reading aloud is fun. I just need to find some people who agree with me. I bet there are a few in New Haven!
And what about other screen entertainment? Movies? Internet? We will still be able to do that, but on my desktop computer. I think the screen is bigger than our TV's anyway. And shows I really want to see? I guess I'll have to try out BitTorrent for size. In the mean time, I've got some packing to do!
Thursday, May 14, 2009
6/21 - 7/20 Yale ED & Orientation
7/21 - 8/17 Bridgeport Hospital ED
8/18 - 9/14 Bridgeport Hospital ED & EMS
9/15 - 10/12 Bridgeport Hospital ED
10/13 - 11/9 Pediatrics at Bridgeport Hospital
11/10 - 12/7 Medical ICU at Yale
12/8 - 1/4 Ultrasound & Anesthesia
1/5 - 2/1 Ob-Gyn at Bridgeport Hospital
2/2 - 3/1 Yale ED
3/2 - 3/29 Cardiac Care Unit at Yale
3/30 - 4/26 Orthopedics
4/27 - 5/24 Medicine at Yale
5/25 - 6/21 Yale ED
This is just one more step in my transition to residency!
Sunday, May 10, 2009
There comes a time when all that's left to be said is, "Goodbye old friend." This week I used that phrase twice. Once to the Harborview emergency department and later in the same day to my clinic shoes. Over the past 2 years I've used a dedicated pair of shoes during ED shifts and overnight call. The day I stepped out of the Harborview ED was the same day I said goodbye to these old friends. The left toe bears the badge of ortho (plaster). The right foot has a spatter from irrigating my last wound in Seattle. Both bear marks from my away rotation at San Francisco General, as the heels and laces retained a tinge of the scrubs' cranberry pink dye. The real reason for discarding this pair was the torn apart left heel and loss of sole traction. Otherwise, with a splash of bleach they'd be ready for another shift!
Sunday, May 03, 2009
The entries each indicate transport to the hospital where I was on call. My willing compliance with HIPAA and patient confidentiality rules prevents me from saying any more about the specifics of the cases, but I will comment briefly on a facet of patient care that could use improvement. Information is often lost in the transition from witnesses to emergency response personel to emergency physicians to their hospital consultants. (I was a student on the orthopedics team at the time.) We hope that the important information is maintained, but invariably, there is something that we wish we had known at the time.
Even with excellent sign-offs between providers, patients come in to the hospital with limited histories. Patients could be 'out of it' due to shock, pain or pain medicine. There could be a language barrier. Patients are sometimes intubated. Important features may have been observed but not documented on the scene, in transit or during an initial physical exam.
One of the important questions in the patient's history for emergency docs are: How did this occur? Among providers, this question becomes: What was the mechanism? Discovering or confirming this info with the patient is one way emergency providers evaluate patient alertness and orientation while they do their injury surveys, so patients sometimes get annoyed at having to tell the same story over and over again. But that's if the patient can tell the story. Sometimes they cannot.
It turns out that the Seattle 911 blog had information that may have been helpful for providers to understand these patients' injuries. In two of the cases from Friday, the entry was made while (or soon after) the patient was in the emergency department, further underscoring the potential utility of electronic documentation of pictures. One of the patients described the accident in a way that when I saw the image, I thought, "I saw the person involved in that accident." The other image generated a, "So that's how that happened" response in me. The importance of pictures (yes, worth a thousand words) is well known in emergency care; the soon to be history Polaroids of automobile accidents are often taped to critically injured patients' charts. The photo below is more a reminder of how beautiful it was on Friday that how the accident occured.
It wouldn't have changed how we treated these patients to know the specifics documented in the blog entries; the primary determinants of treatment are derived from the physical exam and what the x-rays and CT scans reveal. But one wonders if speedy documentation of accidents and injuries in the field could ever be incorporated into the electronic medical record. iPhone medicine is already being practiced in many emergency departments. The fellow on our service used his Blackberry to photograph one of our patients' wounds. He only partially joked with the radiology tech that he needed it to plan for a surgery. The image was later used to communicate with the attending surgeon and was reshown the next morning during a sign-out conference.
Reforming and universalizing the electronic medical record is central to the Obama plan to reduce health care costs. I hope the software programmers include a mechanism for documenting accident photos. In the mean time, maybe I should keep the local injury blogs open on one of the ER's computers.
Photos are from the Seattle 911 blog and were taken by Ben Otteson and Dana Vander Houwen.
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Yes, this is the obligate link to another page post. Sorry about that.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
There's another kicker in the feature (that seems a little off): the carbon costs of marketing and storing a steel bottle on the shelf of an REI or equivalent store may be as much as producing it in the first place!
The bottom line seems to me to be: Use old stuff. Reusing anything is better than buying a new 'green' object. The worst steel bottles are the red colored ones - every time I see someone drink from one, I think, "Noooo! Don't drink that kerosene!" But that's just the Boy Scout in me...
Friday, April 17, 2009
Perhaps it was this cartoon by Milt Priggee...
Not that I'm not a sports fan. I root for the Cubs and try to find places to watch my beloved Pitt Panthers. But it's the other stuff I'd rather do. And the study has particularly suspect scoring methods for 'misery.' Namely not including pro soccer, for which many Seattlites go bonkers for and for giving more misery points to teams that reach the finals but lose... Maybe Seattle residents just find ways to celebrat that they actually got to the finals...
Lest you think this cartoon inaccurate, I live in Seattle, and routinely see eagles, owls, red tailed hawks, Cooper's hawks and ferocious hummingbirds from my window. Salmon spawn within city limits. Seals hang out near the Ballard locks to harvest said fish. And we see snow-capped mountains on any day with clouds above a 7,000 foot ceiling. You can rent a kayak two blocks from my apartment.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
I've not embedded the clip because YouTube has restricted it and because if you are visiting my front page, you still get to hear the "Imperial March" in the background. Wondering why? Read this. Then watch Susan Boyle live a dream.
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
I'd say I had some senioritis before I started my current orthopedics trauma rotation. The schedule alone cured it for me...
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Anyway, this is the sort of information that helps you get through the labor of packing...
Saturday, April 11, 2009
If the cuts are approved, there will be financial capacity for only about half of the flights now made. The governor's office cites that this program is run from a private hospital as a reason to be included in the cuts. The problem with this reasoning is that there is no other service in the state making this kind of transport. According to the article, legislators on an appropriations subcommittee recently recommended restoring the entire $1.4 million that was cut. Even so, I think it's reasonable to engage in discussions about the cost of emergency transport. It seems to me the $9000 per flight cost is worth saving a life.
Thursday, April 02, 2009
Wednesday, April 01, 2009
What if I told you that these same 95 homeless folks cost the city $8.2 million dollars a year before enrolling in the program? That's a savings of $4 million a year!
A study describing this finding was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association yesterday, and was described in a brief article in the (now online-only) Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
And don't tell me you can't read it because you've no password. Log-ins are free!!!
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
On and off for the past 7 weeks, I've been working at the Seattle Veterans Affairs hospital. Many medical students spend part of their time at VA hospitals, but I was not assigned to one until last month. (I completed my geriatrics rotation and part of my radiology clerkship there.) But as with a lot of things these days, the day has come that I will not return to this place for a while.
The reason I am sharing this is to share a funny (if strange) phenomenon I experienced every day on my morning walk from the bus stop or the parking lot. By the time I approached the entry, I had started humming The Imperial March. It didn't matter if I was reading a book on my way in, listening to music or news radio. In the meters approaching the door, I had moved from the well recognized drumbeat to that catchy progression.
I cannot explain this. I mean, it's not like the hospital looks like an Imperial battle cruiser or anything.Or does it...
If your bandwidth is low, you may experience jumpiness in the music.
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Even before President Bush signed an executive order restricting Federal support of embryonic stem cells, there was considerable attention paid to the differences between adult and embryonic sources of the cells. If you aren't sure what is the difference, I'd encourage you to check out this website sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. Knowing the basics will help you understand why I've chosen the following example. There is still considerable conflict - especially in faith communities - about embryonic or adult stem cells. (See my post about President Obama's recent press conference for more details.) The field of stem cells is very large - there's something in the news every week; I'm focusing on one issue that was in the news about two years ago.
In the January 2007 issue of Nature Biotechnology, a group of scientists from Wake Forest University led by Anthony Atala published an article titled, Isolation of amniotic stem cell lines with potential for therapy. (The link needs a university subscription or an email from Dr. Hunter.) The bottom line in this report is a claim that there are cells in amniotic fluid (the nutrient that fetuses consume/breathe before birth) that have some of the same potential to form tissues as embryonic stem cells.
Nature Publishing Group publishes many of the most respected journals in science, and Nature Biotech is one of their gems. Each issue probably generates 5-6 press releases. The relationship between these top tiered journals and the mass media is important. It is the stock pathway for the dissemination of cutting edge science into public knowledge.
Unfortunately, 'cutting edge' in science rarely equates with 'breaking news.' Breaking news is too dependent on context. In this case, the work presented took about 7 years to complete, AND stem cell funding was near the top of the Dems' political agenda for 2009. And when a news story overlaps with politics, there is invariably hype and hope attached to what the science could someday do. (Some social scientists studied this in relation to stem cells a few years ago. If your'e interested, read this paper - you'll need a school subscription or the email from Dr. Hunter.) Did this get published for the hype?
The lab where I got my PhD held a journal club focusing on this paper about 3 weeks after the news broke. (Journal clubs are opportunities to assess for ourselves the merits of a publication, how our experiments might need to change in light of others' results, etc.) Our lab has a reputation for being one of the most skeptical in the field of cardiovascular stem cell biology. The outcome of this animated discussion was unanimous agreement that these cells were much more like (maybe identical to) a type of adult stem cell (mesenchymal stem cells) that are multipotential, but not pluripotential like embryonic stem cells. I could outline about 8 reasons for this conclusion, but that would distract from the real issue I want to bring up: what happens when 6 pages of dense scientific data is condensed to 500 words?
But fiirst, how did this story hit the press? My first contact with the information was an article in a Seattle newspaper. Later, I read an op/ed by Charles Krauthammer suggesting that Bush's decision to limit progress in embryonic stem cell research might have been vindicated with this publication. Initially, I did not catch (but should have expected) headlines like Vatican official ‘rejoices’ in news of amniotic stem-cell discovery and Bush’s Culture of Life ’Confirmed’ by Stem Cell Announcement. Lost in all of the political fallout from this report was a statement made by Atala that this information should NOT be used to argue against the funding of embryonic stem cell research.
Interestingly, when a paper DOESN'T publish science stories, it raises eyebrows. Science writer Michael Fumento announced a cover-up of this information committed by the New York Times when that paper opted not to publish the report. It turns out that their genetics reporter looked at the Atala paper last week and
deemed it a minor [scientific] development.Hooray for Times reporter Nicholas Wade and his science editor Laura Chang! Ms. Chang went on to say,
There is so much hope invested in stem cell research that we have grown increasingly concerned about prematurely fanning these hopes.Fumento lamented on his blog that
it's too bad many editors don't realize they have science writers who don't understand - or worse, misrepresent - science.Exactly! Isn't it strange when we can agree on a statement but not a sentiment?
I believe there are some key questions left to be answered:
- Why did Nature Biotechnology permit publication of a paper that presented mundane data in conjunction with amazing claims?
- Is the manner by which science writers collect their information about scientific reports thorough enough?
- Since it increases visibility of science in general, could it actually be better for science that the public gets this information? (Misrepresented as it may be.)
Saturday, March 28, 2009
As an organization, the ASA does not take a position when there is honest disagreement between Christians on an issue. We are committed to providing an open forum where controversies can be discussed without fear of unjust condemnation. Legitimate differences of opinion among Christians who have studied both the Bible and science are freely expressed within the Affiliation in a context of Christian love and concern for truth.The organization's web site aims to provide resources for Christian (especially Evangelicals) who face conflicts between faith and their understanding of science. The executive director also plays a role advising other groups like AAAS's Dialogue on Science Ethics and Religion (DoSER) and other groups. Our latest project is to help produce science materials for home-schoolers that maintain the high level of scientific integrity that the ASA upholds.
Our platform of faith has four important planks:
These four statements of faith spell out the distinctive character of the ASA, and we uphold them in every activity and publication of the Affiliation.
- We accept the divine inspiration, trustworthiness and authority of the Bible in matters of faith and conduct.
- We confess the Triune God affirmed in the Nicene and Apostles' creeds which we accept as brief, faithful statements of Christian doctrine based upon Scripture.
- We believe that in creating and preserving the universe God has endowed it with contingent order and intelligibility, the basis of scientific investigation.
- We recognize our responsibility, as stewards of God's creation, to use science and technology for the good of humanity and the whole world.
If you are interested in learning more, visit the ASA website or feel free to contact me.
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Watch the Q&A and then indulge me by reading my take on Obama's response.
Did you catch the sections where Obama displayed a strangely Bush-in-the-headlights look. I'll remind you as we read through it again together.
QUESTION: In your remarks on stem cell research earlier this month, you talked about a majority consensus in determining whether or not this is the right thing to do, to federally fund embryonic stem cell research.
I'm just wondering, though, how much you personally wrestled with the morality or ethics of federally funding this kind of research, especially given the fact that science so far has shown a lot of progress with adult stem cells, but not a lot with embryonic?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Okay. No, I -- I think it’s a -- I think it’s a legitimate question.
Actually, no! The question is not entirely legitimate. The questioner added on the to the end of his question the words, "especially given the fact that science so far has shown a lot of progress with adult stem cells but not a lot with embryonic." This is horribly misleading. Adult stem cells have been "researched" for half a century. Human embryonic stem cells were first characterized in 1998. The speaker sets up a straw man that the two types of cells are on level ground. So the question isn't legitimate if it isn't true. By calling it legitimate Obama ceded ground because everybody has in their mind that last phrase. To clarify, embryonic stem cells have shown more promise in the past 10 years than adult stem cells did in their first 25.
OBAMA: I -- I wrestle with these issues every day. As I mentioned to -- I think in an interview a couple of days ago, by the time an issue reaches my desk, it’s a hard issue. If it was an easy issue, somebody else would have solved it and it wouldn’t have reached me.
Look, I believe that it is very important for us to have strong moral guidelines, ethical guidelines, when it comes to stem-cell research or anything that touches on,
AWKWARD FUMBLING-FOR-WORDS SILENCE... So this is why you use the teleprompter so much!!! By the way, it's not cool to conflate morals with ethics. Morals can influence ethics, but they are not the same. This confusion is a big reason so many scientists are upset with the religious right. Morals are personal standards. Ethics inform a social standard. By definition, defining ethics is a consensus-dependent activity. Players on both sides of this argument are still not ready to talk with each other.
you know, the issues of possible cloning or issues related to, you know, the human life sciences.
COME ON! "possible cloning or issues related to, you know, the human life sciences?" I would have liked to hear a reference to the main issue here: when do we think humanity begins?
I think those issues are all critical, and I’ve said so before. I wrestle with it on stem cell; I wrestle with it on issues like abortion.Okay, there it is. Finally, there's a politician willing to call a spade a spade. The reason this debate is so lively is that the pro-life contingent already has a high-functioning political machine... Now we just need some effective communication about how stem cell research isn't the same as abortion.
I think that the guidelines that we provided meet that ethical test. What we have said is that for embryos that are typically about to be discarded, for us to be able to use those in order to find cures for Parkinson’s or for Alzheimer’s or for, you know, all sorts of other debilitating diseases, juvenile diabetes, that -- that it is the right thing to do. And that’s not just my opinion. That is the opinion of a number of people who are also against abortion.Nooooooooooooooo! Not the C-word! What we scientists are after is understanding that leads to treatments. Politicians LOVE cures. The thing is, there aren't many cures in medicine. (And some ill-informed autism advocates want to take those away from us!) When there is no cure, the adoring crowd supporting research could turn to an angry mob. And another thing: When are the politicians' science advisors going to step in to help them understand which diseases stem cell research is likely to yield treatments for??? Stem cell research might have a chance at curing neurological diseases. There's a chance that Parkinson's could be treated because its a pretty well-defined region of the brain that's affected. Even then, I'm not sure we've figured out how to convince the ESCs to become substantia nigra (that's the region of the brain involved) cells, much less how to get them to integrate. But Alzheimer's Disease (AD)? We still know relatively little about how AD occurs. We know it hits different people differently and have really good tests to identify dementia or to diagnose the disease at autopsy, but even the expensive medicines so many people take hardly work at all. Nancy Reagan pleaded with GW Bush to lift his restrictions because of AD. Politicians who support ESC research use Alzheimer's because 1) a lot of people get it and 2) everyone is scared of it. Okay, so I don't like AD or Parkinson's. What are the diseases that could benefit from ESC research? Try spinal cord injury - the first FDA approved human trial for any ESC therapies is underway already. Diabetes is another good one, though my cynical side believes that disease was thrown in because the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation is one of the biggest science lobbying groups. The disease no one talks about is CANCER. What we are learning about reprogramming stem cells will likely inform future treatments for cancer.
Back to OBAMA: Now, I am glad to see progress is being made in adult stem cells. And if the science determines that we can completely avoid a set of ethical questions or political disputes, then that’s great. I have -- I have no investment in causing controversy. I’m happy to avoid it if that’s where the science leads us.
Fair enough. In an ideal world, we will be able to learn from ESCs in order to reprogram other stem cells to do the same thing. And that is exactly what a couple of scientists did recently with induced pluripotent cells (IPCs). Read about them at Wikipedia. A future Nobel Prize may be awarded for this work... But this work would not have been possible without ESC research.
OBAMA: But what I don’t want to do is predetermine this based on a very rigid ideological approach. And that’s what I think is reflected in the executive order that I signed.
Way to finish strong. Let science ask the questions, but have a more-or-less consensus ethical framework within to let them work.
The president wisely ended on the ethics part of the question, so finished strong, but I hope that Mr. Obama's science advisers help him understand this topic so that it's not the science question at his next news conference that he flubs.
QUESTION: I meant to ask as a follow-up, though, do you think that scientific consensus is enough to tell us what we can and cannot do?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: No. I think there’s always an ethical and a moral element that has to be -- be a part of this. And so, as I said, I don’t take decisions like this lightly. They’re ones that I take seriously. And -- and I respect people who have different opinions on this issue.But I think that this was the right thing to do and the ethical thing to do. And as I said before, my hope is, is that we can find a mechanism ultimately to cure these diseases in a way that gains a hundred percent consensus. And we certainty haven’t achieved that yet. But I think on balance this was the right step to take.
And I'll be honest with you: in terms of the potential for the cells to become any tissue in the body, I didn't think that the IPCs would stand a chance against ESCs back when they were first derived. But the great thing about science is that opinions only matter until the data comes back. And if you don't accept the data that everyone else does, you can do the experiment yourself. Unlike politics, the central element of all science is honesty and integrity; when proven wrong, the best scientists dust themselves off and start asking new questions. The investigator who does not will soon be out of a job.
Monday, March 23, 2009
Sunday, March 22, 2009
It's been a little while since I've posted anything at the science and religion blog Clashing Culture. But my co-bloggers over there have kept the place free of cobwebs. I spent a little bit reacquainting myself for the ever-present creation vs. evolution issue this weekend. There's a Texas School Board meeting this Friday to decide science standards for the next 10 years. And of course, some last minute insertions by the board's chair have the scientific community worried that creationism will find its way into science text books... It turns out that the chair of the board Don McLeroy has written an anti-evolution book Sowing Atheism and calls clergy who accept evolution morons. Sounds like the typical anti-intellectual name calling that makes this issue so frustrating to folks like me who just want to get along. In not very related news, one of creationism's champions, Ken Ham, has taken to leveling hypocritical complaints about radio interview ambushes. Read more at Clashing Culture.
Read more about the Texas School Board issue here and the Clergy Letter Project here.
I think it was the personal connection.
- In my career as an EM doc, I will see plenty of shootings.
- I've already been a part of care for a man down.
- I admire how firemen, police officers and medics put themselves at risk for a greater good.
- In the recent match, I ranked the emergency medicine residency at Highland Hospital (in Oakland) very high on my list.
Is there is also a role for EM docs outside in the community talking about violence, safety and emergency response? I'm sure the answer is yes. I wonder what that would look like.
Saturday, March 21, 2009
There's really no reason for me to post this here except that I tend to post things that I think are interesting...
Thursday, March 19, 2009
One of my blog friends recently asked me if the same computer that compares my rank list with 30,000 other lists and the lists from thousands of programs was the same that made Bowl Championship Series calculations. I am inclined to think that this present figuring very well could be an off-season task for the BCS brain. Like the bowl placements, there will be folks happy with the outcome and folks that are not.
By the way, which are the other professions than medicine that use similar systems for job placement as that for medical residents?
- The Military
- Professional Sports
- Anything else?
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Monday, March 09, 2009
The coolest part about Obama's speech today was not the stem cell part. It was:
Promoting science isn't just about providing resources -- it's also about protecting free and open inquiry. It's about letting scientists like those who are here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it's inconvenient -- especially when it's inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda -- and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology.That's the part that will actually change how politics uses the information science offers.
Sunday, March 08, 2009
This reminds me of a theory I once read about kids born in the Great Depression. When money got tight, parents fought and drank more, leaving children bewildered and often alone. Many kids' childhoods were remembered as periods of unpredictability; in their high school years they lacked direction or a sense of confidence.
Childhood depends on a sense of security. I'm guessing there are a lot of parents who will need to work extra hard to provide that emotional support even as the financial backing has failed.
Saturday, March 07, 2009
As you may recall, one of my posts from last year was selected for the Open Laboratory 2008 compilation, which gathered 50 posts from the science blogoverse for a print edition that you can buy. It may seem backwards to take internet material and print it on paper, but there's a good reason for it. The collection's proceeds go toward supporting ScienceOnline'10, a science blogging conference next January. The book is also a nice way to see how bloggers make legitimate literary and journalistic contributions to whatever conversations are being held on matters relevant to science, society and beyond. I've had only a few sciencey things published thus far, so will probably permit vanity to reach into my wallet to buy a print version. It's also available in .pdf. And if you wish to read each post in its original context, each one is linked at A Blog Around the Clock. If you do buy it, do so from lulu.com. The conference organizers get more funding that way.
This type of tube is commonly used to store frozen cells, including stem cells. The tube is thawed, because the red media is clearly not a chunk of ice. I'm thinking the photographer wanted an illusion of pipetting into the vial. But in the picture, the scientist is actually pipetting into the cap. There is a good chance that the diagonal tube is a forceps (tweezers), but with the cinematic techniques used so often on CSI and other science-enriched TV shows, I'm still putting my money on the theory that we're supposed to think there's pipet action going on.
Which is all to say, LOL.
Friday, March 06, 2009
Tuesday, March 03, 2009
Anyway, while researching this week's topic, I ran across a couple of media clips that could be interesting to folks who think health care reimbursement needs to be reformed. Remember Harry and Louise? They were the middle class couple in the mid '90s who didn't take very kindly to the Clinton health care plan. Last year, a consortium of lobbying groups turned that technique on its head. I think they even found the same actors. It's worth heating over to the Ethics in the ER blog to check them out side by side!
If you haven't yet, you'll need to sign up for a free account with Medscape. Sorry about that. And if you have had trouble with the links before, I think that problem's been fixed, too!
Saturday, February 21, 2009
This creates a tough challenge for me. As the newspapers and ACEP present it, this policy clashes with my reasons for choosing a career in emergency medicine. But I've also held that innovative solutions for improving access to medical care should be able to be implemented from within the ED. I didn't hear much about the UHI when I interviewed at the University of Chicago. But in a recent email to applicants, the U of C emergency medicine residency program director did say that training will actually not be very much different because of the University's policy. This makes a lot of sense, given that training occurs at four hospitals around the city and there are always patients in urban ED waiting rooms. And as Ben points out below, it is important to see both sides of this story. But the impression of the program will suffer. Is that a risk I want to take in assembling my rank list?
If you're in my ethics class, we'll be focusing on this issue in two weeks.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Read about it at my article on the Medscape blog. You'll need a free Medscape account if you don't already have one.
Wednesday, February 04, 2009
You may need to sign up for a free account.
Tuesday, February 03, 2009
Who remembers their online HIPAA training course? If your experience is like mine, the topics of privacy and confidentiality seem like boring topics. This week on the blog, several of you posted very interesting accounts of dilemmas concerning confidentiality. If you didn't get a chance to read them yet, I'd encourage you to do so. So perhaps privacy isn't as dry as I first thought? Let's say you're not convinced by your classmates' challenges.
I'll step back a bit. Our medico-legal system may reinforce privacy as a topic learned by rote and repetition, but it gets a lot more interesting when you consider that this issue is at the core of the arguably most controversial Supreme Court ruling in the last half century. Can anyone guess what I'm talking about?
Roe v Wade was decided not based on statutes governing assault, or autonomy, or even Aquinas' principle of double effect. You couldn't guess that from the expressions, “right to choose” or "right to life."The case was decided on matters of privacy. Roe v Wade held that a woman's decision of an abortion falls well within privacy afforded by the 14th Amendment and the Bill of Rights. And since abortions these days are almost always in a medical setting, it's easy to see how the privacy from the state bleeds into the confidentiality afforded by patient-physician relationship.
If you are in the course and happened to find this post early, consider yourself a planted answer if no one responds to my question!
Sunday, February 01, 2009
Interval History:The moral? Rubber chickens never fail to amuse.
Had a good day, with an especially lucid morning. Enjoyed throwing rubber chicken into sink. Family pleased with progress.
NEURO: Continues tremulousness, is mostly non-verbal (per family, is exhausted and getting cranky after busy morning). Throws rubber chicken onto attending physician and into sink.
I personally saw and evaluated the patient. She did seem to enjoy throwing a rubber chicken at me and into the sink. I discussed the patient with Dr. XXX. I agree with the findings and plan as documented in his note.
Critical and identifying information has been changed to protect this patient's privacy.
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Monday, January 26, 2009
But this isn't my standard refer you to The Differential post. I must also alert you that the whole blog has migrated from the Typepad interface to the Medscape platform. That's good for me because I can post entries myself and not have to email them to my editor first. But it COULD be bad for you because you'll have to sign up for a free Medscape account. If you want to bask in the old, all of my articles are available here.
Sunday, January 25, 2009
Perhaps this is true, but what I remember is:
We will restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology's wonders to raise health care's quality and lower its cost.Let's focus on that first part:
We will restore science to its rightful place.Does that mean the science adviser's office will be moving back into the West Wing???
Of course the inaugural address has the potential to be all talk. In his weekly address, he indicated that he will triple the number of fellowships in science. Initially, I wondered if this was at the graduate student, post-doctoral fellow or some other level. But then I found a report on whitehouse.gov with more details about the recovery plan.
With regard to the science in its rightful place goal, it looks like one step is
tripling the number of undergraduate and graduate fellowships in science, to help spur the next generation of home grown scientific innovation.I wonder where all of those students will go after they have their science degrees? Will industry support them? Because I'm pretty sure academia won't. What about those young scientists who are finding it difficult to get their first grants?
Moving on, I think we should talk about the inaugural promise to wield technology's wonders to raise health care's quality and lower its cost. How exactly will we wield the wonders? According to the same Recovery Metrics document, the US government hopes to
computerize every American’s health record in five years, reducing medical errors and saving billions of dollars in health care costs.Riiiiiggght... This one needs a little talking about.
I recently finished interviewing at 12 emergency medicine residency programs. As part of this, I toured some of the country's busiest emergency rooms; in many places I donned scrubs and saw how things worked 'on the inside.' Many places do have an electronic medical record (EMR), but some hospitals said that they probably wouldn't have a system in place by the time I finished residency (that's in four years). So that's a first strike against this goal. If the emergency departments - who provide primary care for more than 50 million Americans and are the first access point for unscheduled medical problems for everyone else - don't have an EMR, how will everyone's record be computerized?
This problem aside, there are additional barriers that need to be overcome if a 5 year goal is to be achieved.
- A standard computer laguage that all EMR platforms use, so when patients move from one office to another or from one system to another, their info can be brought up in the same interface. As it stands now, this is not even standardized in the same hospital. In many places the emergency room's EMR is different from and cannot communicate with the hospital's!
- For patient safety to be increased, more time and/or staff needs to be allowed for computer entry. In emergency rooms with medical records, I was amazed by the amount of time residents and attendings spend in front of computer monitors instead of with patients. In place of noting information on a clipboard while talking with patients, doctors have an extra hugely time-intensive step of data entry. Technology needs to improve. What about notebook style touch screen terminals? Except that would increase cost...
- Is computerized care better? This seems to be a moot question, because everyone's headed in the digital direction. I'm probably just not well enough read on this topic, as the VA health system and large HMOs like Kaiser are all computerized. Are improvements to care there because of computers, or because everything's in the same system?
I applaud both of these goals of training more scientists and making health care safer, but want some more details, too.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
My latest article at The Differential focuses on one component of my interview experience: illegal and inappropriate questions. Check it out, and if you are so inclined, back me up! And while you're there, check out a companion piece by co-blogger Anna Burkhead ponders another ageism related issue.
By the way, special thanks to DrugMonkey for inspiring the legwork to sort out the legal and social rules for this topic.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Sunday, January 18, 2009
We may think of ourselves as being a particular kind of person on the inside, but from the point of view of the world we share, it's hard for me to believe that we aren't largely constituted by the stuff be bring out of ourselves. And I don't think that there's a principled difference between the stuff we bring out of ourselves in a three-dimensional conversation transmitted by sound waves and the stuff we bring out of ourselves in a blog post. Both are instances of communication that give others at least circumstantial evidence about what kind of person we are.This supports my own approach to blogging. I blog because the internet affords a potentially interested audience for expressions that it is logistically difficult to find interest in off-line. And the people I meet on- or off-line will hear the same story, whether the word are printed or spoken. In the end both forms of communication end up shaping our futures, whether by design or accidental. Dr. Free-Ride continues,
Our past is out there on the internets. But testimony about our past would be available even in the absence of the internet (unless, once the recommendations are signed and sent, you've arranged for the speedy demise of all those who mentored you -- something against which I recommend in no uncertain terms). Opting out of leaving an online footprint is not going to give you full authority to tell the story of who it is you are and how it is you came to be that way. Your "authorial intent" in living your life matters, but the lives your life touches give their own testimony, and sometimes the story takes a turn you neither expected nor intended.
Right on! Would I be involved at Virtual Mentor or at WebMD or as an ethics teacher if I hadn't tried out this blogging thing a few years ago?
Saturday, January 17, 2009
Each month, the journal posts editorials, literature reviews, policy positions, and my favorite section: case analyses. In general, the articles are interesting and accessible. Contributions are short to medium length, are written by qualified authors, and most of the time include varied viewpoints. The journal exists on a platform that is easy to use with .pdfs of every article and has some extra features like a podcast and a quiz from every issue. I understand that the entire journal will soon be listed in Pubmed. VM also compiles an excellent library of case studies and analyses from each of its issues. If you ever are curious about a particular issue in medical ethics, I recommend you consult this case index first.
Disclosure: I am an issue editor for Virtual Mentor's 2009/2010 year and am looking forward to assembling an issue related to emergency medicine ethics.